A big-time news headline caught my attention this week. You probably saw it, too. Here's how it was worded in the version I saw:
...the AAP strongly advocates that all policy considerations for the coming school year should start with a goal of having students physically present in school.
Is this the same as
"Pediatricians Call for In-Person School"
???
Seems like a stretch. Even to someone desperately hoping for in-person school. The main points - which are important - raised by the AAP are that: 1) While there is risk for kids attending school in-person, there are non-trivial risks associated with NOT attending school in person, too. These risks even include potentially deadly ones, such as not having abuse or suicidal ideation recognized. 2) The evidence we have regarding Covid-19 indicates that children are less likely to become symptomatic, and possibly less likely to contract it in the first place or spread it to others (other sources appear to corroborate this finding - source 1 source 2). The report goes on to offer "high priority" and "low priority" strategies for minimizing risks at the different school levels.
What I can tell you now, however, is that I don't think the news headline matched the substance of the actual report. While pediatricians have much to tell us about just how important it is to set the goal of opening schools this fall, I don't believe they went so far as to endorse doing so.
If you enjoyed this post, please share it!
Want to make sure you never miss a new post? Subscribe below for email notifications of new content.
Want to read more right now? You're in luck - you can browse past posts by category:
0 Comments
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
About MeI'm an award-winning teacher in the Atlanta area with experience teaching at every level from elementary school to college. Categories
All
|